Outcast: 'A Darkness Surrounds Him' Review

Robert Kirkman's latest show gets off to a flawed start.

Confirmed: John Boyega to Star in 'Pacific Rim 2'

Boyega joins the sequel hot off the success of Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

Box Office: Ninja Turtles 2 Suffers in Anti-Sequel Summer

TMNT 2 is the latest sequel to bring in some disappointing numbers.

Review: Eye in the Sky

Gavin Hood's military drama is an impressive achievement.

Showing posts with label TV Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV Reviews. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

Outcast: 'A Darkness Surrounds Him' Review

The second Robert Kirkman creation to be adapted for the small screen after the juggernaut Walking Dead series, got off to a solid start last night with its season premiere entitled 'A Darkness Surrounds Him'. The episode comes out of the starting gate strong with a chilling opening scene depicting possessed boy Joshua, which is anchored by a very impressive performance by the young child actor Gabriel Bateman. Bateman displays a great understanding of body language, changing his physicality just enough to seem unnatural but not exaggerating to the point where things become cartoonish. What this makes for is a very memorable performance, and a child actor who may have stolen the episode from his far more experienced adult co-stars.

 
Indeed, this episode does seem at its most effective during the claustrophobic nightmare-fuelling exorcism scenes, and ultimately loses its footing in the scenes between. The introduction of Patrick Fugit in the role of Kyle Barnes feels uninteresting, possibly not helped by the fact that it comes so soon after the aforementioned shocking opener. Barnes is a deeply troubled character with a horribly dark past but it feels as if Fugit perhaps doesn't have the acting chops to portray such a role, overshadowed by his co-stars in most scenes. It isn't until roughly halfway through the episode that the performance shows signs of life, when an interesting plot twist makes things even worse for the unfortunate Barnes. Fugit takes full advantage of this development, and shows a marked improvement in subsequent scenes. Still, by the end of the episode it remains unclear whether he was the best choice to lead this series.
 
Wrenn Schmidt and David Denman appear as Kyle's caring adoptive sister and her less understanding husband, but neither character leaves a lasting impression with both requiring a great deal more development over the course of the series. The pair give the best performances they can with what they're given, but of the adult cast it is Philip Glenister who comes out on top with his turn as the weary Reverend Anderson proving to be one of the episode's highlights. The Reverend is perhaps the most well defined and interesting character featured in the episode, feeling like a truly new creation rather than a more general archetype -- a point which many of the show's characters are yet to progress from.


This isn't helped by a script which wobbles at points with certain expository lines feeling forced in to speed up the plot, leading to awkward moments which can briefly take you out of the story. One has to wonder whether this was the right project for director Adam Wingard, whose recent projects The Guest and You're Next have both left room for comic relief and tongue-in-cheek moments, neither of which can be found in this dour episode. Wingard does a competent job drawing from his previous experience in the horror genre but fails to leave a distinctive impression.

Still, in spite of its flaws Outcast definitely has potential. Although this first episode doesn't do a tremendous job of developing its cast of characters, that isn't to say there won't be opportunities to do interesting things with them further down the line. Mysteries crying out for elaboration are healthily sprinkled in throughout this episode, while a reference to the impending and rather ominous sounding 'great purge' gives a clue as to where future episodes could be headed. The show shines in its pulse-pounding and visually arresting exorcism scenes, but should be careful not to lean to heavily on this aspect as overexposure could lessen their effectiveness. Flawed but ultimately an interesting watch, Outcast is definitely a show which should be on your radar.
 

Saturday, 31 October 2015

Review: Supergirl - S1E01 (Pilot)

Comic-book fans have been crying out for a female-led super-hero franchise for some time with Captain Marvel, Wonder Woman, and Black Widow among the names being thrown around for promotion to a starring role. While each and every one of those potential films have faced struggles and delays during their journey to the screen, CBS's new TV series Supergirl has come together relatively quickly. Beginning development in September of 2014, the show is now airing on screens around the world just over a year later: but is it worth your time? Having made it's debut with a trailer reminiscent to an SNL sketch about the misinterpretation of female super heroes, many assumed the show would be terrible - perhaps only marginally better than the much maligned 1984 film starring Faye Dunaway. With that in mind it's quite a pleasant surprise that Supergirl has started off relatively strong, with a pilot episode arguably better than recent episodes of the CW's Arrow in terms of entertainment value.


This episode sets up what this series is going to be very efficiently setting up both a likeable main cast and an overarching antagonist. Perhaps the most disappointing thing about this pilot was that it was a little formulaic and didn't really break any new ground in terms of what these DC super-hero shows are doing. Sure, the protagonist is a woman instead of a man but outside of that the same procedural 'monster of the week' structure that's been the norm since Smallville began in 2001 is still in use here, while the CW-esque melodrama also remains a prominent device. I don't criticize Supergirl too heavily for using these familiar practices as this is network television after all, so to expect anything too edgy would be foolish. However, it does have me wondering just how many more shows can be launched adopting this same formula which audiences will surely grow tired of at some point.

Fortunately, Melissa Benoist brings a lot of fun to the titular role and her charismatic performance immediately had me on the side of Kara Danvers and her mission to help the people of National City (side note: is National City the most generic name for a city in the history of fiction? Yes. Yes, it is.) Jeremy Jordan's character Winslow "Winn" Schott is probably the most loveable member of the supporting cast at this point, although admittedly he seems to be doing little more than filling the role taken by Felicity Smoak on Arrow and Cisco Ramone on The Flash. Chyler Leigh's Alex Danvers comes a close second as her relationship with Kara is well-defined in this opening chapter, while her admission that she felt jealous of Kara's abilities felt like a very understandable human response to your parents adopting a super-powered alien.
Less memorable were the characters of James Olsen, Cat Grant and Hank Henshaw who by this episode's end still feel little more developed than the basic archetypes of helpful friend, bitchy boss and stern government man - although it will be interesting to see if this show draws at all on the latter's troubled comic-book history. That could be a cool arc to watch unfold in live-action. I don't judge Supergirl too harshly for having a few undeveloped characters as it is tough to fit everything in to one pilot, and it's likely this series will have twenty or so episodes to add some interesting elements to those characters currently lacking depth.

One thing I must praise Supergirl for is its action sequences. It's immediately clear that CBS have invested a sizeable amount of money into this show. The airplane rescue looked surprisingly convincing as did Kara's numerous leaps into flight - thank goodness special effects have progressed since the days of Smallville, or we may have had ten years of Kara running in front of a green screen instead. Additionally, the fight with Owain Yeoman's Vartox was also well choreographed even if the villain himself was rather one dimensional. Sadly, that's the case with most of the villains on these shows. The fact of the matter is that the writers on these series' have less than forty minutes to give a villain their powers, establish there goals and chronicle their demise and it simply isn't enough time to do anything truly compelling.

Still, in spite of its flaws Supergirl has already gone above and beyond my expectations. This pilot undoubtedly has problems - some of them it shares with fellow DC shows Arrow and The Flash - but there is real promise here for this series to improve over time. The supporting cast has potential although admittedly could use some development, but Benoist is a genuinely impressive lead whose fun performance will draw me back for a few weeks at least to see if this show's weaker elements can be righted. Could it be that the first successful live-action female super-hero franchise could originate from the small screen as opposed to a bigger budget film franchise? This solid pilot ensures that it's far from out of the question.

Monday, 9 February 2015

Better Call Saul: Episode 1 "Uno" Review - A Rocky Start?

I recently finished watching the first episode of Breaking Bad spin-off Better Call Saul on Netflix, and I find myself with mixed feelings. On the one hand parts of the show seemed to show that the Vince Gilligan magic that made the original show such a smash-hit is still burning brightly, but on the other I couldn't help but feel that this show seems like an inferior and somewhat unnecessary addition to the Breaking Bad mythology.


At it's core, Better Call Saul is a very different show to Breaking Bad and so perhaps it's unfair to compare the two - but that's what I'm doing, so get over it. The first episode of Breaking Bad set up a plot that left you on the edge of your seat, introduced us to a large group of characters that were all interesting in their own ways, and even told a relatively self-contained story in the process. In this sense, Better Call Saul is the vastly inferior show. To start with, after watching the pilot episode it feels like the plot of this show is really all over the place. While the beating heart of Breaking Bad was a relatively simple story - of a desperate man getting involved in crime, and the effect that has on his loved ones - here it feels like there's simply too many moving parts. The show sees Saul teach some local youths how to scam people, attempt to win some dodgy legal cases, take care of his sick brother and also explores Saul's life after the events of Breaking Bad. That is too many plot threads!

The effect this has is that it takes a very long time for this episode to gain any momentum or sense of direction. As a result, I would argue that the first half an hour of this show is actually pretty bland and dull with the final twenty minutes serving as a saving grace and providing a great hook for the next episode. These final twenty minutes are where the show really lives up to it's potential - why? Because it's focused on one plot thread. In the last twenty minutes of this episode there isn't much more jumping around, the show becomes focused purely on the story of Saul and his two apprentices attempting to scam a customer. It is here that the energy present in the best episodes of Breaking Bad can be found, the scenes in this final act left me on the edge of my seat and I hope that this is the direction that they go in with the rest of the series.


Unfortunately, as good as the final twenty minutes of the episode are this première is still bogged down by that tedious opening thirty. Additionally, I was disappointed by the lack of any real supporting characters established here. In the first episode of Breaking Bad Walt's entire family had won my heart and cemented themselves as a fantastic supporting cast. In the first episode of Better Call Saul, you have only one supporting character developed in any depth - that's Saul's brother - but even he isn't particularly memorable. Meanwhile, the character of Mike Ehrmantraut is thrown in there for one scene but doesn't have anything fun to do, and the two hooligans Saul begins to tutor show promise but they lack the depth that the characters of Skylar, Walter Jr, Hank and Marie showed in the first episode of Breaking Bad. If there's one thing that this show improves upon in it's second episode, it should be the supporting characters. The reason for this is because a good supporting cast will add an element of unpredictability to the show. We know that nothing too bad will happen to Mike and Saul, and we know that by the time Better Call Saul wraps up they'll have changed their names and moved to New Mexico. These two facts will suck all the tension out of the show, unless the writers can throw in some characters and plot points that we as an audience can really sink our teeth into.

As for the performances in this episode, Bob Odenkirk and Michael McKean are both solid in their roles but to be frank, no one else stands out as requiring praise. As I say, there simply aren't any great supporting characters to come out of this first episode, and as a result the supporting actors are equally forgettable.



Sunday, 31 August 2014

Bojack Horseman: Episode One Review

Bojack Horseman starring Will Arnett and Aaron Paul is the latest Netflix original series, and it's the first foray into the genre of adult animation for the streaming service. Therefore it isn't wholly surprising that the show's first episode is far from flawless. But while it has a way to go before it can even think of becoming the next Archer or Family Guy, Bojack Horseman does have some potential which I hope can grow and flourish during the shows twelve episode run.


The premise of Bojack Horseman is quite ingenious. The titular character (Arnett) is a washed up sitcom star who - after the cancellation of his high rated, but critically panned TV show - finds himself sitting around his expensive home all day doing nothing except complain to his stoner house-guest, Todd (Paul). However, this wonderful premise isn't pulled off as well as one would hope. While there are some funny moments in the first episode, it doesn't deliver on laughs in the same way that other, more established series' do. That isn't for lack of trying however, there were many moments in the season premiere where I felt like I should be laughing, but the laughs just weren't coming. I put this down to the show not knowing what it wants to be.

Bojack Horseman has all the elements in place to adopt the kind of absurd comedy typically used in shows created by Seth MacFarlane, however it never makes the most of them. That would be fine if the show adopted the other route for an adult animated series - more mature humour as seen in the FX hit series Archer - but this isn't something Bojack does either. Instead, it decides to linger in between the two comedic styles, ultimately not pulling off either of them to any great effect. This means that the show just isn't as funny as it could or should be, and it's a great shame to see two very talented actors go to waste in this first episode.




Friday, 20 June 2014

Agents of SHIELD: Season 1 Review

Agents of SHIELD is finally over, and what a journey it was. This show was so up and down for so long that it's hard to draw an opinion of the overall series, but in the end I would say that I have come round to the show in spite of its flaws. Agents of SHIELD isn’t perfect, but ultimately I’m happy that we’re getting a second season. Does that make Agents of SHIELD a success? Well, kind of. There are going to be some major spoilers for the first season in this review so if you’re planning to watch it, then you have been warned. Now lets get into it.

1. THE CHARACTERS

The characters in Agents of SHIELD started off as the most generic archetypes you could possibly think up. You had the young hotshot who doesn’t want to join the team, the cute “will-they, won’t-they” pair who just can’t believe their luck, the unpredictable wild card with issues, and the serious person of Chinese descent.

These characters are not what anyone would call interesting, but I think it was Skye who got the most hate and that’s because it felt like she was being forced on us - or that's my opinion at least. To me it seemed like Joss Whedon and Kevin Feige were screaming in my face, “Look at her, look at how likeable she is. You like her. You can’t believe how cute she is, you just fucking love her, don’t you?” NO! I fucking don’t! Get her away from me.

However, after 22 hours of exposure to these characters I really do feel more attached to them, to the point where I’d say there’s a nice 70:30 split between characters I like, and characters I’m still not thrilled about. Melinda May, Fitz, Simmons, and Coulson are characters I don’t have a problem with. May is a relatively good TV-level substitute for Black Widow and Fitz-Simmons – while I was originally resistant to their adorableness – won me over in in the end and now I have to admit they’re quite a fun couple. As for Coulson, I actually wouldn’t say he’s the best character on the show, but ultimately it’s hard not to like him after his much-loved role in the MCU movies.

Fitz and Simmons began as an annoyance, but grew on me by the end...
On the flipside, Skye I’m still not totally sold on. She has improved since the pilot, but all those little heart to heart chats she had at the beginning have really tainted her for me. Those chats were even lamer than some of the quote-unquote emotional moments from early Smallville episodes. They were that bad.
Additionally, Ward is still very bland even after turning evil and killing Victoria Hand. My main reaction to that can be summed up by, "Meh, he’s still pretty boring."

Speaking of Victoria Hand though, why would you kill her off? In the comics, Hand was such a cool character, and I was looking forward to watching her flourish. And then Ward shot her two times in the chest and I was like oh. Great. The door is open to bring her back Coulson-style, but they can’t just do that for everyone who dies, especially as it wasn’t really fully explained how they brought Coulson back to life. All that was said was Fury got a robot to fuck about with his brain and some alien guy - it wasn’t a hugely thorough explanation. Also, bringing back characters left right and center would simply end up making death as meaningless in the Marvel movies as it is in the Marvel comics and nobody wants that.

2. THE STORY

Let’s talk about the overarching story of Agents of SHIELD: Season 1. The clairvoyant/Hydra. This is a story that I feel was pulled off relatively well, but still it wasn’t great. The fact that we weren’t introduced to the person who turns out to be the clairvoyant until 14 episodes in I feel is a bit weird. Plus it didn’t really come to a huge shock to me when it turned out Garrett was the Clairvoyant, mainly because we’re not really given many opportunities to get on board with the character and find him likeable. There was something about him from the first episode he appeared in that seemed off and I never thought of him as a trustworthy character.

Why is SHIELD so much cooler in the movies?
However, that being said I did like how heavily the series ended up tying into Captain America: The Winter Soldier, because it really had to given the events of that movie. I was also happy to see they didn't back down at the end of Ward's character arc. I had a terrible feeling that at the end of the series Ward was going to turn good again and it was going to be no hard feelings all round. Thankfully that didn’t happen. Like I’ve already said, Ward is boring. I’m glad he’s gone.

Ultimately, Agents of SHIELD’s story was passable, a solid C Grade, however now that the foundation has been laid – and the characters aren’t as bad as they were when the show began – I’m hoping for something a little more fulfilling come Season 2.

SEASON 2

So it was announced a little while ago that we will be getting a second series of Agents of SHIELD, maybe just as a way for Marvel to save face but even so! The question is: What can we expect from the second season?

WELL HERE’S SOME PREDICTIONS:

1.     Fitz will have some kind of brain damage that prevents him and Simmons from hooking up. Hollywood loves to drag out "will they won’t they" scenarios. Everyone knows this. Just look at Friends: How long did it take for Ross and Rachel to finally get back together? Too long. But the pair will probably finally kiss in the season 2 finale.

2.     Skye is going to have some kind of low-grade super power. It’s been hinted at throughout this series that there is something special about her, so there’s got to be some kind of pay off there I would imagine. When it comes to Skye’s ominous looking parent, I would say that it probably won’t be a character from the comics, but if it is it will be a really low-profile one that no one gives two shits about.

3.     Ward will come back at some point, either as a villain or while trying to redeem himself.

4.     May and Coulson are going to hook up because they’re the only two people on the team over the age of 30.


Saturday, 29 September 2012

Doctor Who: "The Angels Take Manhattan" Review

Aside from the opening episode of this series of Doctor Who, I won't lie - I've been disappointed. "Dinosaurs on a Spaceship" was a little too light-hearted for me. Don't get me wrong, I know Doctor Who isn't meant to be serious, but I just found that one a little too far-fetched.
"A Town Called Mercy" was just plain boring, and "The Power of Three" was promising but had a rushed ending.

However, this episode was awesome.

"The Angels Take Manhattan" is the last adventure for Amy and Rory, and so I was worried that it would be an underwhelming end to their time with the Doctor. I really shouldn't have been. This episode is definitely the strongest of the series so far, and is touching farewell to two of the Doctor's most memorable companions yet.


As the title suggests this episode sees the return of the fan-favourite Weeping Angels. Taking place in Manhattan things start off a cheery affair for the Doctor and co. But within the blink of an eye (get it?), things start going from bad to worse for our time travelling friends.

One thing I haven't enjoyed with previous episodes of the new series (again, excluding the first episode), is that the stories have seemed overly simple. So much so that they struggled to keep my attention. Not so here! In this episode writer Steven Moffat really pulled off a smart, emotional tale which kept me on the edge of my seat for the duration.
I was worried that maybe things were getting a little too complicated at one point, and there are a few little things left unanswered like what happened to the guy collecting the statues? Why was the American guy at the opening of the episode significant? But for the most part Moffat tied everything together in the end - kudos for that.

Of course a great script cannot work without some great actors. The regular cast of Matt Smith, Karen Gillan, and Arthur Darvill fill that space - joined by Alex Kingston reprising her role as River Song.
This talented group continue to have great chemistry, and all deliver great performances from start to finish. I'm trying not to spoil the ending if you have not yet seen this episode, but I have to say that they all really did do well at the ending which turned into quite a tear-jerker.

So that's all for Doctor Who until Christmas! Thankfully it went out with a bang. I started this review telling you how disappointed I was with the current series of Who. But I'm finishing saying that this episode alone has got me excited for the rest of the series this Winter. "The Angels Take Manhattan" is a fantastic episode, not only the best of this series, but also one of the best episodes I've seen in a long time.

It's a worthy end to Amy and Rory's adventures and a must see for any Who-fan.
What did you think of this episode? Let us know by commenting below!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Craig has loved Doctor Who since a child and definitely did not cry at the end of this episode. He's new to Twitter, so follow him here and show him some love.


Saturday, 28 January 2012

Life's Too Short: Episode 7 Review

Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant's mediocre sitcom finally finished this week. Unfortunately, it couldn't even go out with a bang. Instead, episode 7 wasn't very funny, but instead was boring and just made me glad the series has finished.

This week's finale saw everything go wrong for Warwick: Losing his money, the divorce, his home and his respect. But still I struggle to see any reason for this series being made. Even now, Warwick's character has only improved slightly despite all the crap that has flown his way. It just doesn't make any sense. If someone was in his position in real-life they would be some-what humble, what they wouldn't do is make a twat of themselves at a charity fund-raiser - which is exactly what happens here.

This week's celebrity cameo came in the form of Sting and was just incredibly mediocre. Sure, it wasn't that bad, but what Gervais and Merchant have failed to understand is the novelty of them picking on celebrity's seems to have worn off. I won't go into too much more detail simply because I don't see the point and I don't want to spoil anything - so let's just say that while this cameo isn't the worst, in the end it's forgettable.


I can't think of much more to say that I haven't said before, so let's make this short (no pun intended). Life's Too Short is a disappointing, forgettable sitcom starring an unrealistic, over-familiar main character, a lack of strong supporting characters and a very thin plot.
This finale is just as underwhelming as previous episodes, suffering greatly from the aforementioned problems listed above and the fact that it just wasn't very funny. Gervais and Merchant have taken the Extras/The Office formula of cringe-worthy comedy and beaten it to death. I just pray that rumours of a second series aren't true.


Life's Too Short: Episode 6 Review

If you've been reading my reviews of Life's Too Short, you'll know by now that I'm not a massive fan. It's just a very flawed series. And while it still has problems, this episode is at least an improvement over last week.

The episode is mainly about a party that Warwick throws in his new flat, but between that there's some more divorce settlements and a hilarious scene involving a washing machine.
That's right. I said hilarious.


Many times in the past I've complained about how Life's Too Short just isn't very funny - and while this episode still isn't filled with laughs - this scene in particular did cause me to laugh-out-loud.
Accompanying this one were some other mildly funny moments. Keith Chegwin, Shaun Williamson, and Les Dennis continue to bring in a few laughs, which to be honest is surprising!
This episode also re-kindled my love for Cheryl, who remains the best character in the show.

Unfortunately, Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant decide to make a cameo in this episode and once again it just feels utterly pointless. There is no reason for those two to be in it at all. They bring nothing to the show - no laughs, no plot - they just want to have their faces in the spotlight.

This week's celebrity cameo comes from Tess Daly. She does quite well - especially considering she's not an actress. And she does have a few funny lines, just not too many. Her cameo is probably 3rd best of the series, (behind Liam Neeson, and Helena Bonham Carter).

Warwick (as a character) remains very difficult to like or relate with. He's just a little too unrealistic. But he's not quite as bad as he was last week. I'm hoping to see him change into someone a little more likeable by next week - it is the final episode after all. If he doesn't then I'm going to struggle to see the point of this series.

Anyway, in the end Life's Too Short, Episode 6 is better than last week. There were actually funny moments, and a slightly less annoying Warwick to deal with. But, the series still can't dig itself out of mediocrity - the funny moments don't come often enough, and the way Gervais and Merchant insist on making cameos in most of the episodes is just getting annoying!


Life's Too Short: Episode 5 Review

So here we are again. Another episode of LTS has come and gone, and unfortunately not much improvement has been made.
This episode sees a bit more of a plot - Warwick's trying to find a new girlfriend and ends up meeting a great woman....but she too is a dwarf. This leads to some truly stupid scenes which seem to make no sense at all. Why would Warwick have a problem with dating a dwarf, when he too is one? It just doesn't make any sense!


I doubt anyone to be as self-conscious as Warwick is in this episode - and even if they were, they certainly wouldn't behave like he did. I get that Warwick's character is supposed to be a dick-head, but Gervais and Merchant have made him too much like one - so now they've got a character that is not only completely unlikeable, but also just ridiculous and unbelievable.

Despite this, the episode does manage to improve slightly over last week's abysmal offering. First. there's generally a few more laughs in this episode (although still not that many!). It opens with an amusing, albeit unoriginal night club scene, and it manages to go out on a high via a conversation between Sean Williamson, Les Dennis and Keith Chegwin.

Also, there's no shoe-horned in appearance from Gervais and Merchant this week, meaning the episode flows a bit better.

But at the end of the day, this episode suffers from the same problems that have plagued the series as a whole. It's got a bad main character, a script that offers few funny moments - as well as practically no story - and the absence of a supporting cast is yet another weak spot. Not to mention the fact that it's basically just a poorer version of the comedy duo's last two series'.

With only two episodes left, LTS needs to pull something out of the bag pretty quickly to be remembered as anything other than a disappointment.


Life's Too Short: Episode 4 Review

Life IS Too Short for painfully unfunny comedies - like this one!

Last week I deluded myself.
I thought that Gervais and Merchant actually had a message to put across with this series - this week's episode told me how wrong I was.

Episode 4 sees Warwick negotiating with his wife about his divorce, and also sees him move into a new house - that's it. Where recently I thought I saw a plot emerging, I now realise that this is just as plotless as before. Nothing happens - not just in this episode, but generally throughout the whole series - nothing has happened. And this poor plot just makes the series so boring to sit through.


What doesn't help is that the comedy in this episode is non-existent. The series has never been laugh-out-loud, but this episode is about as fun as a lecture about the history of envelopes.

What doesn't help is that Warwick's character, i.e. the one in every scene, remains unlikeable and a complete d**k-head. I know he was written this way - but I can't think why. Had the character been a nice one, then not only could I have sympathised with him, but also it would have been a breath of fresh air from Gervais and Merchant's usual work.

This week's main cameo comes from Steve Carell, and is by far the worst yet. With the exception of Liam Neeson (Episode 1), none of the cameos have been too spectacular - but this one just isn't funny at all. It's just an awkward Skype call, that provides no laughs. This is so disappointing as Carell is capable of a lot more.

And, although it pains me to say it, not even Cheryl (Warwick's dim assistant) could make me laugh this week.
Gervais and Merchant have gone for obvious humour that a 5-year old could have come up with, and thrown in some unfunny, but instead verging on offensive jokes, about Dwarfism.

Episode 4 really is a new low for this already average series. It failed to create many laughs at any point, including during the guest appearance. It's becoming very hard to believe that this came from the minds behind Extras and The Office.


Life's Too Short: Episode 3 Review

Can this series be saved?

After I watched the second episode of Life's Too Short I was really disappointed. Quite frankly, I thought it was crap. BUT, after watching it a second time I thought maybe I was judging it too harshly. I should stop comparing it to the greatness of The Office/Extras because it will never be as good as them. I just need to accept it for what it is and then maybe I'll get more enjoyment out of it.

With that in mind I watched episode 3 and I felt that there was an improvement.


Episode 3 follows Warwick as he sets up a website and gets himself a job working opposite Helena Bonham Carter - despite an uprising from many of the DwarvesForHire clients.

I found the episode to be generally a lot better than the previous one. There was more of a plot and more funny moments - although still not enough for humour to be the shows strongest point.
Cheryl continues to be the best character by far, and Helena Bonham Carter manages to be a lot funnier than her frequent co-star Johnny Depp was, with a guest appearance almost rivaling Liam Neeson's. Almost.

Plus, I found something in this episode that I had failed to see in previous ones. I think I finally see the message that Gervais and Merchant were trying to get across when writing this. And that message is how prejudice people can be to dwarfs, and adding to that, how degrading and embarrassing being a dwarf working in show business can be. I'm glad I figured this out as it gave me a lot more respect for the series.
But, I think if they really wanted to put across this message they could have made Warwick's character more likeable as - while I did sympathise with him a bit in this episode - I still found him to be a bit of an arrogant d**k. This just makes it a bit harder to get on board with the message, as the other dwarfs are only covered briefly.

I also found the awkward moments in this episode to be a lot less tedious than they were before, and did in fact get some enjoyment out of them.

Basically, what I'm trying to say is that Life's Too Short: Episode 3 is a big improvement on the second and is one of the best episodes so far. With a better story that hints to a more serious message, and more funny moments, this episode has given me a bit more hope that the series could yet be redeemed.


Life's Too Short: Episode 2 Review

Johnny Depp's in, Liam Neeson's out - but has episode 2 improved upon the disappointing pilot?

No. Definitely not.

I wasn't overly impressed with episode 1 of Life's Too Short, but with Liam Neeson's hilarious cameo and the fact that it was only the first episode, I still had hopes for the series.
I don't anymore.

In this episode Warwick goes to a sci-fi convention, a Star Wars themed wedding, and ends up meeting with Gervais and Merchant again. But why? Episode 2 is just so plotless. Instead of telling an actual story, Gervais and Merchant have just made a series of events that take place one after another - that's it. Sure, maybe this will turn into a story later on, but there's no guarantee of that!

Not only does LTS have a bare-bones story, but it's also missing another one of the things that made Gervais and Merchant's previous series' a success - and that is a good selection of supporting character's. E.G, In Extras - You had Andy Millman as a main character, but then there was Maggie, and Darren, and Barry, and Greg, and the BBC Execs -- I could go on!
LTS on the other hand has Warwick in the lead, with Cheryl being the only supporting character. Gervais and Merchant are in it every week, but only as themselves and they don't provide any laughs.



Thankfully, the aforementioned Cheryl does remain quite a good character and the only one with any funny lines. But she's not good enough to be the only alternative to Warwick - who remains an annoying and completely unlikeable character.

As I mentioned before, last week's show was saved by Liam Neeson's great cameo at the end. Unfortunately, Johnny Depp isn't at all as good. This may not be his fault, and may be the cause of some bad writing, but he just isn't very funny in this show. He has some lines that may turn your expressionless face into a smirk, but apart from that - nothing.
Also, Gervais seems to think that everyone saw the Golden Globes and knows exactly what went on between him and Depp - well that's not true. I just have to assume Gervais pissed him off somehow. I could be wrong, but they don't show the Globes on any of the main channels in the UK meaning they are easily missable.

The awkward moments from older series' that Gervais and co. try to replicate in LTS fail again this episode, and continue to be boring moments that just remind you what a twat Warwick's character is. There is not one relatable or redeemable feature about him at all.

I really am disappointed with this second episode. The first wasn't a masterpiece, but it had some funny moments. This episode is just a plotless mess. It has very few funny moments, a poor appearance from Johnny Depp, and another pointless one from Gervais and Merchant themselves. With only one likeable character in the whole show, it just becomes annoying and boring to watch!
I'm beginning to think the comedy duo did this series just to make some more money, and work with more famous people - whatever reason they did it for, it wasn't to make people laugh.


Life's Too Short: Episode 1 Review

Life's too short is the latest offering from comedy duo Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant, but can it stand up to their previous work? If Episode 1 is anything to go by then...not quite. But it is still an entertaining show.

Life's Too Short is a cross between the duo's last two series' Extras and The Office. It's filmed like a documentary (like The Office), but instead of being filmed in an office, it revolves around the life of Warwick Davis - an actor with dwarfism who has appeared in films like Harry Potter and Star Wars, as well as guest starring in an episode of Extras - but who has recently found himself struggling for work (like Extras).


This first episode gives us an insight into Warwick's life. We find out that his career isn't the only thing going badly in his life, and that he also has his own dwarf acting agency.

This is a solid concept and is done fairly well, but there doesn't seem to be as many funny or cringe-worthy moments in this series, unlike previous offerings from Merchant and Gervais.
They try to recreate the face-palm moments from Extras that made the series painful yet entertaining to watch, but can't quite do it. Instead these moments are just a little tedious, and I just wanted them to get on with the rest of the show.

But, while the funny moments don't come quite as fast as they used to, Life's Too Short definitely did have funny parts.
Highlights for me had to be the interview Warwick has with his new secretary (played by Rosamund Hanson), who is written for perfectly and is one character I look forward to seeing again.
Also, this week's guest star Liam Neeson comes in at the end and steals the show. He offers the episode's only real, laugh-out-loud moments, but almost doesn't get used enough.
Gervais and Merchant themselves are in Life's Too Short as well, but they don't get much screen time either, and the only time the two really shine are during Neeson's cameo part. This would have been okay, but I found Warwick himself to be a pretty uninteresting character unlike Andy Millman and David Brent were.

But generally Life's Too Short is a pretty funny program, albeit one that fails to be as good as Gervais and Merchant's previous creations. Although, it is definitely still worth watching and a show I'll be sticking with for at least another week.